Blokiments Docs
  • 🚀Welcome to Blokiments Docs
  • ⭐Start here
    • Build your first advanced signal bot
    • Crypto Security Tips
    • Essential Checklist Before Buying Any Crypto Token
  • ❓Frequently Asked Questions
  • 🛣️Roadmap and Releases
    • Releases
    • Supported Networks
  • 🧑‍🤝‍🧑Referral Program
  • FEATURES
    • Strategies
    • Discovery Hub
      • Filters guide
        • General filters
        • Social filters
        • Security filters
        • Trading filters
        • Our scores
    • Token Analyzer
      • Security metrics
      • Social metrics
    • Caller tracker & analysis
      • Finding well performing callers
      • Caller analyzer
      • Real-Time Alerting
    • Smart Money analysis
      • Find smart money wallets
      • Analyze wallets with ease
      • Track wallets in real-time
    • Watchlists
    • Alerts
      • Telegram Alerts
      • Discord Alerts
      • Webhook Alerts
    • Search
    • Telegram Token Checker Bot
    • Blokiments API
      • Google Sheets Integration
      • Get historical price data
  • GUIDES
    • 🔥Strategy building guides
    • 📚Blog
      • Security
        • Smart contract honeypot analysis
        • Rug pullls
        • Pump Scammer Analysis
        • Smart money scammer
        • Token Sewage Spill on Base
      • Tokenomics
      • Presales
      • 💧Liquidity
        • Liquidity pools
      • Getting Slipped? Or getting MEV’d?
      • Smart Token Sniper
      • Token Comparison Workflow
      • The Value of Merging On-Chain and Off-Chain Data in Token Analysis
      • The bad, worse, and the worst
      • Caller tokens analysis
      • In-depth token analysis
        • In depth: RFC
        • In depth: Magnetix
        • In depth: House
      • In-depth wallet analysis
        • Wallet report #1
        • Wallet report #2
        • Wallet report #3
    • 📑Useful resources
      • Twitter
      • Github
      • Webpages
  • About
  • Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
  • LINKS
    • App
    • Twitter
    • Community
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Token Comparison
  • MISSOR
  • LNQ
  • Key Metrics Breakdown
  • Liquidity
  • Security
  • Socials
  • Trading
  • Utility
  • Key Takeaways in comparison

Was this helpful?

  1. GUIDES
  2. Blog

Token Comparison Workflow

What makes one coin more attractive than another? Let's see how can you compare two tokens.

PreviousSmart Token SniperNextThe Value of Merging On-Chain and Off-Chain Data in Token Analysis

Last updated 9 months ago

Was this helpful?

The two tokens were evaluated on 5/8/2024. The data presented here might differ if you check the tokens on our platform today.

Let's dive into the details using two tokens as examples: and .

First of all, 🚨 THIS IS NOT A FINANCIAL ADVICE🚨 . We're not in any way connected to the two tokens discussed here; they were chosen randomly for educational purposes.

Token Comparison

  • Market Cap: $500k

  • Blokiments Score: 20

  • Description: A coin with no real value.

  • Website: Not working

  • Total Liquidity: $50k

  • Initial Liquidity: 0.7 ETH

  • Burned Liquidity: 100%

  • Social Media:

    • : 89 followers (falling trend)

    • : The group is inactive.

  • Security Metrics: We have detected that the token has whitelisting and trading cooldown functions. These functions are not a direct sign of a scam, but malicious use of these functions could make the token a scam.

  • Shillers: A shiller group, ‘Dream calls 100x’ mentioned the token on 8/04/2024 as an “unknown token, with potential moon. DYOR.” The token was revived on 3 August 2024 after being dead since December 2023, so this is strange behavior.

  • Trading Metrics: There have been no changes in buyers or sellers for months, but there has been recent activity due to the price pump.

  • Market Cap: $30M

  • Blokiments Score: 85

  • Description: Token connected to AI tools.

  • Total Liquidity: $2.3M

  • Initial Liquidity: 62 ETH

  • Locked Liquidity: 98% locked, to be unlocked on 27/2/2025

  • Social Media:

  • Security Metrics: Appear to be okay

  • Listings: BingX, MEXC, BitMart, Bitget

  • Holder Metrics: The largest address holds 6.69% of the supply.

  • Trading Metrics: Increasing number of buyers and volume in the last 30 days.

  • Community: Active Discord community

Key Metrics Breakdown

Liquidity

Liquidity ensures that a token is tradable. You can have $100M worth of tokens in your wallet, and you might think that you are a millionaire. But if there is only $10k in the liquidity pool, then you can only sell around $5k worth of tokens (depending on the ratio of base and quote token in the pool). Congratulations, now you can be a “thousandaire.”

Initial liquidity is usually a good indicator of “how serious the team is about the project”, but not always. Initial liquidity is the amount provided to a pool by the team once they make a token tradable.

Locked and burned liquidity indicates that a team cannot perform a rug pull using liquidity.

  • MISSOR: $50k total liquidity with 100% burned. Initial liquidity was 0.7 ETH.

  • LNQ: There is $2.3M in total liquidity, with 98% locked for 6 months. The initial liquidity was 62 ETH.

Security

Security should speak for itself. If there are intentional malicious parts of code in a token's smart contract, we should not trade them at any cost. Scammers are getting smarter and smarter, so we need to keep up with detecting their evolving scam tactics. For now, to get the scam metric, we combine our internal scam detection with other providers.

  • MISSOR: Contains functions that control trading cooldowns and whitelisting, it could lead to a scam.

  • LNQ: Security metrics look okay with liquidity locks, and there are no immediate red flags.

Socials

Social metrics are important, as they show how engaged the project is on social platforms. The more recognizable the project is, the more people it will attract, and more money will flow into the token pool, which should increase the token's price.

  • MISSOR: There is very low engagement on social media. Twitter followers are decreasing, and the Telegram group is inactive. There is no website, but Shiller has seen recent activity.

  • LNQ: High and growing social media presence. Twitter followers and Telegram members are both increasing.

Trading

Trading metrics indicate a token's trading activity. If it is actively traded and has a lot of volume, it means that the token is interesting for traders. We can also use these metrics to observe price trends.

  • MISSOR: Poor trading metrics with no significant changes in buyers or sellers over months. Recent activity is likely due to artificial price pumps.

  • LNQ: Positive trading metrics with an increasing number of buyers and trading volume over the last 30 days.

Utility

The most important part of looking for a project that will last long is the project's utility. Why would I need a token that doesn't do anything? Memecoins are usually made just for laughs and making quick profits, without any use case other than buying before others buy and selling before others sell. On the other hand, some more established projects use tokens in their ecosystem that provide different services or use cases that would make me buy this coin for other reasons than just for price speculations.

  • MISSOR: A coin with no real value or utility.

  • LNQ: Connected to AI tools, indicating potential real-world utility.

Key Takeaways in comparison

  1. Liquidity: LNQ has significantly higher liquidity, which is mostly locked, suggesting a lower risk of rug pulls.

  2. Security: LNQ shows better security metrics and no immediate red flags, unlike MISSOR, which has potential scam indicators.

  3. Socials: LNQ has a strong and growing social media presence, whereas MISSOR’s presence is almost nonexistent.

  4. Trading: LNQ’s trading activity is robust and increasing, while MISSOR’s is stagnant, with recent activity likely due to artificial influences.

  5. Utility: LNQ has a clear utility as a coin connected to AI tools, whereas MISSOR is a coin with no real value.

In conclusion, LNQ is a more attractive token based on liquidity, security, social presence, trading activity, and utility compared to MISSOR, which lacks in almost all these areas.

Check the two tokens on our platform:

Website:

: 39,300 followers (increasing)

: 6,200 members (increasing)

📚
MISSOR
LNQ
MISSOR
X
Telegram
LNQ
Working
X
Telegram
MISSOR Details
LNQ Details